Meteor strikes may not be random

Meteor impacts are far less random than most scientists assumed, according to a new analysis of Earth-strike meteors.

The research, reported on the pre-press astrophysics website, concluded that meteor impacts are more likely to occur at certain times of the year when Earth's orbit takes us through streams of meteoroids.

The majority of meteors analysed hit the Earth in the second half of the year, say the researchers, brothers Carlos and Raúl de la Fuente Marcos of the Complutense University of Madrid.

"This lack of randomness is induced by planetary perturbations, in particular Jupiter's, and suggests that some of the recent, most powerful Earth impacts may be associated with resonant groups of Near Earth Objects and/or very young meteoroid streams,"  they report.

Meteoroid streams can be generated by the break-up of an asteroid or comet.

A planet or moon can also affect nearby asteroids and meteors, herding them into loose orbits called 'resonant streams', which can be broken up by big planets such as Jupiter and Saturn.

The study is based on 33 meteor impact events detected between 2000 and 2013 by infrasound acoustic pressure sensors, operated by the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization.

The sensors are designed to detect clandestine nuclear tests, but also pick up meteor impacts with an explosive energy in excess of a thousand tonnes of TNT.

   Impact times

The researchers looked at when and where each of the 33 meteors hit the Earth, as this enabled them to determine where it might have come from.

They found 17 impacts occurred in the northern hemisphere and 16 in the south; 25 impacts occurred within 40 degrees north or south of the equator, while only eight occurred at higher latitudes.

Significantly, the authors found a 21 per cent difference in meteor timing, with 20 impacts across the second half of the year compared to just 13 hits in the first six calendar months.

For people in the southern hemisphere, June was the most likely month for a meteor to hit the Earth, while September and October were the least likely. Overall though, more meteor impacts were recorded in the second half of the year -- 12 compared to four in the first six months.

North of the equator, November was the most likely month for a meteor hit while May and June were the least likely. Distribution was pretty even throughout the year with nine meteors occurring in the first half of the year and eight in the second half.

However, the authors believe the timing will change as old meteoroid streams dissipate and new ones form.

   More data needed

This theory makes sense says Dr Simon O'Toole of the Australian Astronomical Observatory.

"What we had always assumed up until this paper, was that meteor impacts were random, occurring at any time and in any place," says O'Toole.

"This new work points to asteroids orbiting out near Jupiter, getting disrupted from their orbits by the planet's gravitational perturbations, and this can have an impact for us here on Earth."

However, O'Toole is concerned that the study is based on only 33 individual impact events.

"It's a very interesting paper, but 33 events is a statistically small sample range," says O'Toole.

"This needs far more data."

Print Page

Fukushima Unit 1 Fuel Removal Delayed

TEPCO announced they would delay the removal of both spent fuel from the pool and from the reactor vessel at unit 1, Fukushima Daiichi. What is not clear is exactly why. TEPCO cited having to remove excessive debris from the buildings. They have known the conditions inside the building and the refueling floor for a number of years.

Investigations into the building and refueling floor began as early as 2011 with an in depth screening of the refueling floor done in 2013. No detailed recent investigative work at unit 1 has been admitted and no new findings about the condition of the building have been released in recent months.

There has been some delay while they spray fixative and take a more cautious approach to removing the building cover, but that is currently only expected to cause about a 6 month delay. This new schedule puts spent fuel removal at 2019 and melted fuel removal at 2025.

   IAEA to send experts to analyze seawater

The International Atomic Energy Agency will send two marine experts to Japan to report their analysis of the sea water off the coast of the defunct Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant.

Experts from the IAEA affiliated Environment Laboratories in Monaco collected the samples in September to examine the effects of radioactive materials on the ocean's ecosystem.

The laboratory's director David Osborn and another expert will visit Japan from November 4th to the 7th.

The IAEA has been advising Japan to disclose comparative analysis of the results of more than one institution to enhance transparency and ease concerns of neighboring countries.

The two experts also plan to compare water analysis results from Japanese and IAEA laboratories to assess the accuracy of Japanese data.

The IAEA will take new samples off the coast near the Fukushima plant on November 5th.

Print Page
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...